The CMS Myth

November 2008 - Posts

  • Eight Ideas for Nurturing Online Communities

    A job opening came across my desk recently. The alumni office at New York college is seeking an online “community nurturer.” The role involves maintaining “an online community with social networking and event marketing components for over 79,000 alumni.”

    Kudos to the college (Buffalo State) for recognizing an oft-overlooked imperative: if you intend to establish a successful online community, plan on staffing it with someone with the skills to tend it, to grow it, to breathe life into it.

    But with CMS vendors tripping over each other to bring you bundled CMS solutions that manage your content and website as well as your online community (blogs, wikis, forums, ratings, social networking), we tend to ask the obvious: Think throwing a CMS at your content-rich website instantly solves your content and web strategy problems? No? That goes double for running a vibrant online community.

    So let’s puncture this Myth-in-the-making before it grows wings: “If you build a community, will they come?” “The answer is: maybe; but it will take some serious nurturing to succeed.

    Just like a backyard garden that requires watering, fertilizing and weeding long after you’ve planted seeds, growing and maintaining an online community is a process that really never ends.

    There are clear parallels between the traditional website content manager role and mindset, and that of the successful web community manager.  If you’re jumping into the fray (or considering it for 2009) here are some best practice tips from what we’ve seen and learned:

    1. Put your online community in the hands of someone who can live and breathe it every day. And if you can’t devote at least a part-time resource, consider holding off starting your community.

    2.  Ensure your community manager has the right mix of skills. They’ll need to be ready to write, edit, create e-newsletters, evangelize topics and brands, review user-gen content, monitor comments, reach out to active members – and communicate constantly with the audience.

    3. Think about giving the community manager(s) a persona – let them establish an identity, use their face and name. Establish them as a dynamic presence who represents the community and bridges your company (or college, or non-profit, or publisher) with member interests.

    4. Actively foster active participation. Dynamism is key – focus on getting people to communicate, comment, share, provoke ideas and questions. Rating members based on frequency of participation, or prodding them with small giveaways for participation, can help provoke interaction, and bring new ideas to the community.

    5. Develop and nurture a handful of evangelists to keep things moving.  Don’t underestimate the power of a devoted fan or follower outside your organization who brings enthusiasm and genuine interest to rev up the community and keep members coming back for more.

    6. Constantly tap into the motivation and interests of your audience – define (and ask) why they’re there, what excites them, and try to serve them what they want (within reason) – and be ready to shift gears when they do.

    7. Be authentic in your approach to cultivating the community and resist looking at it as a marketing lever to drive more traffic and transactions.  Avoid hitting members over the head with product messages, for example.

    8. Use the community for front line research and trend-spotting, and run that up the chain at your company, incorporate it into your service, product, or website.

    Do you have any best practice ideas for running an online community? We’re all ears. Please share your ideas and thoughts in the comments section or email us.

     

  • Are CMS Vendors Selling to Marketers or Building for Marketers?

    Folks in the world of web content management can likely agree that marketers are taking more ownership of the web – if not total ownership in many cases.

    CMS vendors have largely made the shift to speak more directly to the needs of a marketer.This is happening with the website messaging, marketing-friendly feature lists and solution-selling scenarios developed within the sales teams.

    This shift is both smart for business and absolutely necessary to meet the changing needs of the web-driven organization. However, it’s critical to take a closer look at specific vendor offerings to see if they can walk the walk that their marketing speak talks. 

    After all, CMS vendors have historically been very IT focused. It’s simply not in the DNA of most CMS product management types to think like a marketer.  Some will be able to effectively turn the boat around and some will attempt to keep putting lipstick on a pig. We’re still in the early stages of determining the winners and losers.

    While we’re not here to evaluate the marketing merits of individual CMS vendors (yet), we are noticing that the messaging is shifting faster than the product development. Extra features are being bolted on to satisfy a few tactical marketing needs, when in fact a more complete product overhaul is often needed. It’s unclear if this effort is truly underway behind the scenes.

    This all poses a real risk for marketing-centric buyers that don’t understand the technical complexity of a CMS.  Buyers need to deep dive into marketing specific scenarios during the evaluation process, ask more specific questions and talk to marketing focused references. 

    There is a difference between selling to marketers and building for marketers.  My money is on the vendors that choose the later.